Showing posts with label students. Show all posts
Showing posts with label students. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Friday, March 11, 2016
Teachers in the Clouds
by Ron Samul
"So what’s better? A teacher who waits in the wings till students need them, or one who “softly and silently vanishes away” when they are no longer needed? Or, rather, which is better when?" -- Sarah Honeycurch
In higher education, I've been actively trying to reposition myself self in terms of my role as the instructor in the class. I don't think lecturing and traditional content delivery are viable. When I saw this questioned posted on NoMadWarMachine website, and I connected immediately with some of the students I worked with last spring and into the fall.
It is inherent in my teaching style to foster collaboration with student writing and research. I want them to be good researchers, better writers, better thinkers -- I also think that I have to step aside and let them write and be effective in their practice. It might take some students a few tries to format, argue, and research their work, but that practice is good work for students. Teaching overview skills to the entire class and then working with students one-to- one is important to fostering an individualized yet pedagogical approach to their writing. And there I am, "a teacher who is in the wings till students need them." While I know they are writing their research papers, I am waiting to assist, collaborate, and redirect students to resources, motivation, and other elements of the writing process. In Star Wars terms, this is Yoda in the swamp teaching his pupil the ways of the Force.
In recalibrating my purpose and interaction with students, it is clear that sometimes (with a few students) it is more important to disappear and be the whispering voice. In many ways we are in a contract with the student. They are taking the course and we have an obligations to instruct in the subject area. But how and why we do that is constantly transforming. More and more students come to me asking -"when am I really going to use this in my career." In some cases, they have a point - but not everything we learn we use in our jobs. That is where the transference of skills and ideas needs to be fostered. And perhaps, like Yoda, we need to show how important some of the transferability of their skills are across many jobs and skills they will be using. You will need to be proficient at formatting documents, finding effective articles and research, and they will have to communicate clearly. Students want individualized education and I want them to experience their educational path as an individual. But I also want them to be well versed in taking skills out of the classroom and turning them into assets in the real world.
The beauty of our job is that we will disappear, but the hope is to have an echo caught in the ears of the students - a voice that says you need to write, think, and express yourself. It is everywhere - and that is why you don't think you need them.
"So what’s better? A teacher who waits in the wings till students need them, or one who “softly and silently vanishes away” when they are no longer needed? Or, rather, which is better when?" -- Sarah Honeycurch
In higher education, I've been actively trying to reposition myself self in terms of my role as the instructor in the class. I don't think lecturing and traditional content delivery are viable. When I saw this questioned posted on NoMadWarMachine website, and I connected immediately with some of the students I worked with last spring and into the fall.
It is inherent in my teaching style to foster collaboration with student writing and research. I want them to be good researchers, better writers, better thinkers -- I also think that I have to step aside and let them write and be effective in their practice. It might take some students a few tries to format, argue, and research their work, but that practice is good work for students. Teaching overview skills to the entire class and then working with students one-to- one is important to fostering an individualized yet pedagogical approach to their writing. And there I am, "a teacher who is in the wings till students need them." While I know they are writing their research papers, I am waiting to assist, collaborate, and redirect students to resources, motivation, and other elements of the writing process. In Star Wars terms, this is Yoda in the swamp teaching his pupil the ways of the Force.
![]() |
Yoda to the left. |
In recalibrating my purpose and interaction with students, it is clear that sometimes (with a few students) it is more important to disappear and be the whispering voice. In many ways we are in a contract with the student. They are taking the course and we have an obligations to instruct in the subject area. But how and why we do that is constantly transforming. More and more students come to me asking -"when am I really going to use this in my career." In some cases, they have a point - but not everything we learn we use in our jobs. That is where the transference of skills and ideas needs to be fostered. And perhaps, like Yoda, we need to show how important some of the transferability of their skills are across many jobs and skills they will be using. You will need to be proficient at formatting documents, finding effective articles and research, and they will have to communicate clearly. Students want individualized education and I want them to experience their educational path as an individual. But I also want them to be well versed in taking skills out of the classroom and turning them into assets in the real world.
The beauty of our job is that we will disappear, but the hope is to have an echo caught in the ears of the students - a voice that says you need to write, think, and express yourself. It is everywhere - and that is why you don't think you need them.
Ron Samul is a writer and educator. For more information or to contact him, go to www.RonSamul.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Unquestioning Writing - When Good Is Good Enough
by Ron Samul
As writers, we are constantly thinking about the audience and the impact of our writing. It is a fundamental element of teaching, thinking, and writing. It made me think, when I saw this tweet by Maha Bali, when she mentioned this moment.
This is a complex idea, and from a writing standpoint, it is also a brave idea. Writers as communicators and creative generators always seem to humble and diminish their craft. In this case, Maha is confident and sees that sometimes - no one comments because of the "powerful". I really admire the confidence and the realization that sometimes - that the power of writing can overwhelm. Why?
Social Media
The concept of finding something meaningful and important on social media is relevant to me. Online courses, MOOCs, connected learning, creative spaces -- all interact through social media. For me, learning, thinking, and listening to very smart and creative people comes from my interaction with social media. However, not everyone comes to social media to find that kind of connection.
Some people are connecting with family and friends, some are just passing by while they watch their favorite TV show, some are broadcasting on Periscope as they walk to work. Why people use social media is tailored to each person. The depth of reading and interaction really comes down to the user. And it isn't happening in real time, it is happening along a timeline that could be shifting through time zones and cultures. Sometimes, the most important statements or blog posts don't get the attention I think they deserve, merely because I posted them on a Friday afternoon before a holiday (fail).

But more importantly, people are looking for an interaction that is quick and reactive on social media. Things that make them stop, think, and experience deeper level thinking, (which relates to selective solitude, pausing, and deep reflection), may not fit into the "Like" or "+1" world of immediate reaction. This has spurred the age of important, meaningful quotes on stunning images.
In this scan and click age, deep thinking and impactful ideas sometimes need a difference venue. It sometimes needs a blogpost, or some area where things can be expanded and slowly unpacked. And sometimes, the "Like" or the "Share" simply doesn't relate the importance of meaning at that moment. Sometimes, I see an image or a concept and I want to keep it. I want to hold on to it. But where would I keep it? Social media lets you keep it on social media terms. But when something is meaningful, we want to do more than just throw it on our timeline. Perhaps it is merely my personal need to embody ideas, art, and writing in tangible ways. Social media isn't going away and perhaps a thirty-year archive of my Facebook posts will allow me to go back and find that poem I recall so sweetly. But I want to make moments my own - outside of the screen. I want to print them out and save them. I want to fold them up and leave them in a book to discover them in a few years.
Student Writing
Being a writing teacher is a complex beast. Following syllabus standards, rubrics, college standards, your own vision, and the student's vision - we create a position where we are looking for the right answer to the assignment. Writing is subjective and I am looking at process, not the right order of words in a sentence. I am looking at critical thinking, how you cite sources, how you can create a document that convinces me. There is some excellent writing that comes by in terms of student writing, but I find that those elements are the product of good thinking, critical research, and planning. It comes from students who engage the learning process. And sometimes, compared to the whole class or the entire writing section, you have to acknowledge excellence as it comes to you. And sometimes, after two or three rewrites and a clear process of thinking and learning - there comes a moment when you don't need it better. They have learned - they have more than met your requirements, and they deserve to stand in that moment and feel the significance of their work.
Creative Writing
Creative acts are a different beast. When you apply rubrics and grading schemes to a poem or a short story, it gets awkward and complex. The "powerful" concept that Maha tweets about can be emotional, formative, and change the way we see the world. That is what art does. And sometimes, from a creative writing mentor point-of-view, you have to judge something that isn't vetted through a rubric or a course guide. It comes from emotion, it comes from form and content magically aligning to make a moment (perhaps in time if read or spoken) that matches our time and space with the ideas of someone else.
I always question my role in interfering with the creative process. It isn't my story to tell, it is my job to make the writer think about making the story better. That is complex. And my suggestions are never - "throw this out and start over," because I would be devastated if someone told me that. But this "powerful" part of writing and speaking is fascinating to me. And there has to be a moment when we realize that expression and time meet you when you need it. There are so many poems, books, and important things written all the time. When I need them (personally), they will be there. I don't always see them now because I am looking at different things that I need now. We are all on different paths and moving in different ways. We find those moments that are "powerful" because we are looking. We need to stop counting "likes" and stats, and imagine that if one person moved forward because of the power of our words, it is always... always worth it.
I don't think I am done defining Maha's "powerful" because I think there is a lot to the creative elements here. There is an important conversation here in defining the "powerful" in our writing, in our expression, and in our ideas. We need to value them - make an earnest and important effort to value those words and ideas that can change lives. It may not make you famous or popular, but it is a rich and deeply thoughtful life, one without regrets.
by Ron Samul -- want to know more about me... go here.
As writers, we are constantly thinking about the audience and the impact of our writing. It is a fundamental element of teaching, thinking, and writing. It made me think, when I saw this tweet by Maha Bali, when she mentioned this moment.
This is gonna sound funny, but I think sometimes one can write something that is SO powerful that no one comments. Because it's that good!
— ℳąhą Bąℓi مها بالي (@Bali_Maha) December 15, 2015
This is a complex idea, and from a writing standpoint, it is also a brave idea. Writers as communicators and creative generators always seem to humble and diminish their craft. In this case, Maha is confident and sees that sometimes - no one comments because of the "powerful". I really admire the confidence and the realization that sometimes - that the power of writing can overwhelm. Why?
Social Media
The concept of finding something meaningful and important on social media is relevant to me. Online courses, MOOCs, connected learning, creative spaces -- all interact through social media. For me, learning, thinking, and listening to very smart and creative people comes from my interaction with social media. However, not everyone comes to social media to find that kind of connection.
Some people are connecting with family and friends, some are just passing by while they watch their favorite TV show, some are broadcasting on Periscope as they walk to work. Why people use social media is tailored to each person. The depth of reading and interaction really comes down to the user. And it isn't happening in real time, it is happening along a timeline that could be shifting through time zones and cultures. Sometimes, the most important statements or blog posts don't get the attention I think they deserve, merely because I posted them on a Friday afternoon before a holiday (fail).

But more importantly, people are looking for an interaction that is quick and reactive on social media. Things that make them stop, think, and experience deeper level thinking, (which relates to selective solitude, pausing, and deep reflection), may not fit into the "Like" or "+1" world of immediate reaction. This has spurred the age of important, meaningful quotes on stunning images.
In this scan and click age, deep thinking and impactful ideas sometimes need a difference venue. It sometimes needs a blogpost, or some area where things can be expanded and slowly unpacked. And sometimes, the "Like" or the "Share" simply doesn't relate the importance of meaning at that moment. Sometimes, I see an image or a concept and I want to keep it. I want to hold on to it. But where would I keep it? Social media lets you keep it on social media terms. But when something is meaningful, we want to do more than just throw it on our timeline. Perhaps it is merely my personal need to embody ideas, art, and writing in tangible ways. Social media isn't going away and perhaps a thirty-year archive of my Facebook posts will allow me to go back and find that poem I recall so sweetly. But I want to make moments my own - outside of the screen. I want to print them out and save them. I want to fold them up and leave them in a book to discover them in a few years.
Student Writing
Being a writing teacher is a complex beast. Following syllabus standards, rubrics, college standards, your own vision, and the student's vision - we create a position where we are looking for the right answer to the assignment. Writing is subjective and I am looking at process, not the right order of words in a sentence. I am looking at critical thinking, how you cite sources, how you can create a document that convinces me. There is some excellent writing that comes by in terms of student writing, but I find that those elements are the product of good thinking, critical research, and planning. It comes from students who engage the learning process. And sometimes, compared to the whole class or the entire writing section, you have to acknowledge excellence as it comes to you. And sometimes, after two or three rewrites and a clear process of thinking and learning - there comes a moment when you don't need it better. They have learned - they have more than met your requirements, and they deserve to stand in that moment and feel the significance of their work.
Creative Writing
Creative acts are a different beast. When you apply rubrics and grading schemes to a poem or a short story, it gets awkward and complex. The "powerful" concept that Maha tweets about can be emotional, formative, and change the way we see the world. That is what art does. And sometimes, from a creative writing mentor point-of-view, you have to judge something that isn't vetted through a rubric or a course guide. It comes from emotion, it comes from form and content magically aligning to make a moment (perhaps in time if read or spoken) that matches our time and space with the ideas of someone else.
I always question my role in interfering with the creative process. It isn't my story to tell, it is my job to make the writer think about making the story better. That is complex. And my suggestions are never - "throw this out and start over," because I would be devastated if someone told me that. But this "powerful" part of writing and speaking is fascinating to me. And there has to be a moment when we realize that expression and time meet you when you need it. There are so many poems, books, and important things written all the time. When I need them (personally), they will be there. I don't always see them now because I am looking at different things that I need now. We are all on different paths and moving in different ways. We find those moments that are "powerful" because we are looking. We need to stop counting "likes" and stats, and imagine that if one person moved forward because of the power of our words, it is always... always worth it.
I don't think I am done defining Maha's "powerful" because I think there is a lot to the creative elements here. There is an important conversation here in defining the "powerful" in our writing, in our expression, and in our ideas. We need to value them - make an earnest and important effort to value those words and ideas that can change lives. It may not make you famous or popular, but it is a rich and deeply thoughtful life, one without regrets.
by Ron Samul -- want to know more about me... go here.
Ron Samul is a writer and educator. For more information or to contact him, go to www.RonSamul.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Friday, December 11, 2015
QR Codes and Your Syllabus

Ever feel like your syllabus becomes a major work of contractual obligation, spelling out expectations, clauses for different areas of the college, purpose, and intent? Do you feel like much of your syllabus is based on issues that have come up in the past and need amending? My syllabus feels like a complex governmental document that doesn't always outline the creativity and importance of the course - but just a lot of boilerplate things that the students don't read anyway.
There is a lot of different ways to reinvent a syllabus, but I would like to add a few QR Codes to my syllabus. By adding Quick Response Codes in my syllabus, students have some quick access to me. Here are some ideas.
- By scanning a QR Code - students will be able to load my contact information into their phones with one quick scan, including my phone number, email, and office location.
- By scanning a QR Code - students will be able to find my office on Google Maps and get there without excuses.
- By scanning a QR Code - students can link to the course website or upload a copy of the syllabus to their phones or tablets.
Students are coming into the classroom phones and tablets. These once basic things are now very powerful. Using CR Codes in developing a quick connect to elements in the syllabus might allow students to quickly access information that would take time to enter into their phones.
This does not mean that we will discard traditional syllabus information and institutional goals and templates. But it does give students Quick Response Codes that will allow them to gather information quickly and have it in their devices.
For students who are not interested in scanning codes - they still have access to the printed material and information. While it might seem like a novelty - it also can guide them to places like the course website, the login space for a LMS, or even take them to the library homepage for help with subject guides and other resources.
Assignment Sheets
This concept applies to assignment sheets. When I present an assignment to my class, the first thing I do is pass it out on paper. If there is a QR Code on the top of the assignment sheet - students can then use their phones or devices to access the URL where they can find the electronic versions of the assignment. On that sheet, students might also find QR Codes for library resources and other elements. While I would provide links and other pathways to discovery for non-scanners, this would be an easy why for students to find this information.
Tutoring centers could develop their own QR Code - a key to signing up for tutoring appointments or schedule.
I should mention - I really admire the practicality of QR Code boxes, however, I think they look oppressive. I've seen some graphic designed boxes that look cool. I wonder where the line can be draw between funcationaly and looks when it comes to these codes. I annotated a poem using QR Codes and it looked so odd.
In searching for cool QR Codes I found these and -- they work! Try it!
Like all technology, we run the risk of putting too much focus on a particular element of technology. In looking at different ways to use these boxes, it has allowed me to study a peice of imprintable media that can be used in a variety of ways. It isn't all very functional. In fact, sometimes, it doesn't work at all. But it is a way for us to help students input, access, and share information on the devices in their hands right now. It has also allowed me to develop and think about how these odd electronic keys might open different opportunities for me and the students in an academic setting.
Ron Samul is a writer and educator. For more information or to contact him, go to www.RonSamul.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
QR Code Project on the Ground / Leftovers from #DigiWriMo

I asked the students in my Graphic Novel course to write reviews of graphic novels that are in the library. Then we created QR Codes to print on a bookmark that was inserted in the books. When students at the college find these bookmarks in the books, they can scan the code and see what people are saying concerning the book. The students wrote an introduction, a commentary on the artwork, the comparative landscape, and (of course) their own verdict of the graphic novel. Adding cover art, links and vidoes, the students completed the assignment. The objective of the course was to allow students to create an artifact (bookmarks), while drawing interest to the graphic novel collection in our library. It was the librarians that supported our efforts in creating the design, getting them into a display format, and adding them into the books.
Monday, December 7, 2015
Good Article About the Connections Between Academic Writing and Blogging

The other important feature that isn't mentioned in the article (but I will throw it in anyway) is that blogging also gives you space to contribute and write on ideas that you might be drawing in from digital course, mentoring, and other collaborative expereinces.
Pat Thomson is a Professor of Education in the School of Education, The University of Nottingham.
http://patthomson.net/2015/12/07/blogging-helps-academic-writing/
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Reflections On Mentoring / "Only connect..."

Monday, November 30, 2015
Capacity
Teaching a graphic novel course is always fun. The best part is the exploration: from different genres of comics, to artistic styles, and great stories. In defining what a graphic novel can do, to that of a comic story, I use the example of Capacity by Theo Ellsworth. This book brings about a visual and story based epic that captures some stunning philosophical ideas, creations, and connections. There are times in this graphic novel that I completely get lost in time and space.
Why is Capacity as an art form so estranged from the typical comic experience and so in tune to what we think and see in the real world?
Let's start with the minutia of the artistry. I don't mean that it is all about small things, but Ellsworth is creating a word that is complicated and hyper detailed. The complexity of character and image creates a complicated and sometimes complex matrix of ideas that aren't based in our reality, but in something more abstract and subconscious. The reader isn't defining the next panel or how the story is going to end, but how odd that figure is, or how long it takes to draw so many tiny scales. But when you pull back and see that inner workings, it makes a stunning and prolific universe. Not only is the narrative story (in this case I mean words) epic, it is interactive. Often the narrative accesses your vision and choice in a friendly banter. This is what draws the reader to the inside. It is there that we begin to ask ourselves, what is going on. The stories are filled with epic failures, uncertainty, and sometimes hubris. It switches from brilliant moments of understanding of the consciousness self and then shifts back to how he lived in his car. While it is about the commitment to art and the stories that he discovers in his mind, it is also about the reality between the outside world and the inside.
Capacity is a stunning imaginative wandering and it doesn't work without the symbiotic relationship between the images and the words that balance one another in the vision and scope of the ideas. In some ways, the artwork affords further into the mindscape that he creates than even the narrative suggests. It is a complicated and visual wandering.
When I passed this book out in class to share and let the students see the creativity and ideas in the book, most of them took some time. One girl stayed after class, not realizing that everyone was gone and she got lost in the poems, the stories, and the details. I didn't bother her for awhile because I had been lost in that same way. This is a powerful and very creative comic.
Why is Capacity as an art form so estranged from the typical comic experience and so in tune to what we think and see in the real world?


When I passed this book out in class to share and let the students see the creativity and ideas in the book, most of them took some time. One girl stayed after class, not realizing that everyone was gone and she got lost in the poems, the stories, and the details. I didn't bother her for awhile because I had been lost in that same way. This is a powerful and very creative comic.
Sunday, November 8, 2015
#DigiWriMo / Collaboration, Mentoring, and the Stigma of Writing in Isolation.

Experimental Collaboration
A few years ago, I wrote a story with someone else and the idea was similar to our Story Jumpers, I would write five pages, and the other person would write five pages and we would see where it might go. The hardest part was never really being sure where the story was going. It feels odd to write something that you are ready to connect and relate with, and then pass it off to someone who has their own ideas and connections. That was difficult because even if I planned something with implications to the future, it might be shifted or dismissed in the next few section. And that was unsettling. The writing that the other writer presented was excellent and often connective, but without the ability to move through a story arc, plot, or character development - it felt like every submission was a let's wait and see what happens.
What happens when we lose control? And why is it important for us to see the whole things? Some writers feel like they should know the end before they even start a story or a creative endeavor. For that type of writer -- this idea of collaborative writing might be maddening. No closure, no completion.
Thursday, September 3, 2015
About The Door: A Reaction to "Why We Rhizo"

Saturday, May 16, 2015
#Rizo15 / From Connections to the Classroom Part II
A few weeks ago, I selected a few students in my college research writing class to venture out into a rhizome type of adventure. These students took up the challenge with excitement and apprehension. We sat down for an end of the semester wrap up of their work, ideas, and connection. I knew they would work hard and move forward with something they were passionate about. However, something intrinsically valuable emerged.
The two projected that emerged from the three-week adventure in learning and thinking came in the form of research for a nonfiction book project while the other student worked on collecting data through a survey that tried to define "ambition". Both of these projects had different approaches. The nonfiction book project was focused through reading, connecting, journal writing, and refining the ideas that might end up in the story. The ambitious survey on ambitious was driven by data. I thought that was an interesting choice because it moves away from subjective forms of thinking. I expected these projects to be about investigation and inquiry (they were) but to seek out data was a formidable and fact driven experience.
Beyond their areas of research and inquiry, they started their time outside the classroom with some apprehension. They had to "detox" from the typical experience that education offers. One student spoke about how good she is at understanding the objective content of a course and repeating and demonstrating that for the instructor. And that is exactly what some course look for in testing and written assignments. This experience pushed away from that. The fear and the uncertainty of what they might learn was probably overwhelming. But, once they moved into their thinking process and got in to their ideas, they worked hard. They were motivated by their topics and ideas, and they owned them completely. In some ways, I felt like I had to prove my trust to them. I had to be sure that no matter what they did and said - they were learners that were trusted and valued. At no time would I throw on my instructors hat and say, "Okay, this isn't working and now you need to write a paper for me." We have to trust that rhizomatic learning takes twists and turns. Sometimes, they will be bogged down and sometimes they will seem like they are moving very quickly. It isn't my job to evaluate and grade that progress.
Over the course of this semester I often challenged (I refer to her as my ambitious student because she was trying to define and measure ambition) a student again and again because I wanted her to think about the meaning of words, the way people use them, and what is behind those ideas in our societal constructs. Once I cut her loose on the Rhizome Experiment, I think she realized that she needed more information from the world and she created surveys and put it out there. If the idea that you should "write the book you would want to read" is true, then for a up and coming sociologist, creating the data that she couldn't find when she wrote papers for me is indeed a significant learning step.
The writer did more traditional connecting to books, ideas, and what her content might include. She had connected with a lot of books and ideas. She had journaled about her project and what she wanted to write. One thing I asked her to do was not write about everything in her journal, but focus her writing only on this writing project. She mentioned that she couldn't possibly journal about something as open and expansive as "meditation" or what you might be thinking in general. So, it helped her to focus and create ideas solely around her ideas for this project. She not only had some really focused ideas on the subject, she also started to think about the personal stories that might make it into the pages of her book. Connecting her research, her ideas, her reading and finally - her personal story will become her foundation for designing and writing the book. I can't wait until she finally starts connecting the connections and the personal stories together. It is the beginning of the blurry boundary between what you know and how you feel. That is a place for significant exploration and reflection.
To say I am proud of these two students wouldn't be enough credit to their hard work, their innovation, and their willingness to do something different. They both felt like they wanted more of this in their education. They want more time to explore, more time to find answers, look at things that aren't in one textbook but across seven textbooks. They also wanted some freedom to think and refine their ideas.
I wasn't surprised that they wanted more of this kind of thinking and learning. But they reminded me that it doesn't really exist in our educational system. I asked them to think about ways they can suggest and work with instructors to move toward this kind of learning and creation. It would be easy for them to prove themselves in the classroom, but they might have to initiate the conversation with the instructors how and what they might do. They may have to convince the instructors that they want more. Most instructors aren't expecting that - and it often means more work for them to move students off the typical class scheme. We always think about how technology and different modes of thinking can be education disruptors. The best thing I can do is to empower these students to disrupt traditional learning so they can take every opportunity, move all their own ideas, and take control of their learning. It isn't for every student, but this kind of learning is infectious and once you have it, you want more of it.
___________________________
Note: I have invited the students to check this post and comment if they want to add to the conversation.
The two projected that emerged from the three-week adventure in learning and thinking came in the form of research for a nonfiction book project while the other student worked on collecting data through a survey that tried to define "ambition". Both of these projects had different approaches. The nonfiction book project was focused through reading, connecting, journal writing, and refining the ideas that might end up in the story. The ambitious survey on ambitious was driven by data. I thought that was an interesting choice because it moves away from subjective forms of thinking. I expected these projects to be about investigation and inquiry (they were) but to seek out data was a formidable and fact driven experience.
Beyond their areas of research and inquiry, they started their time outside the classroom with some apprehension. They had to "detox" from the typical experience that education offers. One student spoke about how good she is at understanding the objective content of a course and repeating and demonstrating that for the instructor. And that is exactly what some course look for in testing and written assignments. This experience pushed away from that. The fear and the uncertainty of what they might learn was probably overwhelming. But, once they moved into their thinking process and got in to their ideas, they worked hard. They were motivated by their topics and ideas, and they owned them completely. In some ways, I felt like I had to prove my trust to them. I had to be sure that no matter what they did and said - they were learners that were trusted and valued. At no time would I throw on my instructors hat and say, "Okay, this isn't working and now you need to write a paper for me." We have to trust that rhizomatic learning takes twists and turns. Sometimes, they will be bogged down and sometimes they will seem like they are moving very quickly. It isn't my job to evaluate and grade that progress.
Over the course of this semester I often challenged (I refer to her as my ambitious student because she was trying to define and measure ambition) a student again and again because I wanted her to think about the meaning of words, the way people use them, and what is behind those ideas in our societal constructs. Once I cut her loose on the Rhizome Experiment, I think she realized that she needed more information from the world and she created surveys and put it out there. If the idea that you should "write the book you would want to read" is true, then for a up and coming sociologist, creating the data that she couldn't find when she wrote papers for me is indeed a significant learning step.
The writer did more traditional connecting to books, ideas, and what her content might include. She had connected with a lot of books and ideas. She had journaled about her project and what she wanted to write. One thing I asked her to do was not write about everything in her journal, but focus her writing only on this writing project. She mentioned that she couldn't possibly journal about something as open and expansive as "meditation" or what you might be thinking in general. So, it helped her to focus and create ideas solely around her ideas for this project. She not only had some really focused ideas on the subject, she also started to think about the personal stories that might make it into the pages of her book. Connecting her research, her ideas, her reading and finally - her personal story will become her foundation for designing and writing the book. I can't wait until she finally starts connecting the connections and the personal stories together. It is the beginning of the blurry boundary between what you know and how you feel. That is a place for significant exploration and reflection.
To say I am proud of these two students wouldn't be enough credit to their hard work, their innovation, and their willingness to do something different. They both felt like they wanted more of this in their education. They want more time to explore, more time to find answers, look at things that aren't in one textbook but across seven textbooks. They also wanted some freedom to think and refine their ideas.
I wasn't surprised that they wanted more of this kind of thinking and learning. But they reminded me that it doesn't really exist in our educational system. I asked them to think about ways they can suggest and work with instructors to move toward this kind of learning and creation. It would be easy for them to prove themselves in the classroom, but they might have to initiate the conversation with the instructors how and what they might do. They may have to convince the instructors that they want more. Most instructors aren't expecting that - and it often means more work for them to move students off the typical class scheme. We always think about how technology and different modes of thinking can be education disruptors. The best thing I can do is to empower these students to disrupt traditional learning so they can take every opportunity, move all their own ideas, and take control of their learning. It isn't for every student, but this kind of learning is infectious and once you have it, you want more of it.
___________________________
Note: I have invited the students to check this post and comment if they want to add to the conversation.
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
#Rhizo15 / What I've Been Missing
It has been an interesting week and some really fascinating and creative ideas have been swirling around #Rhizo15. I can say that I am truly inspired and amazed at how powerful and connected this has been for me as an educator and a thinker.
I spend too long creating things in a vacuum. If I am creating a syllabus, a course schedule, resources, a blog, something to offer the students when they walk in the door, I have only met my own perception of what I think is going to happen in the classroom. What I've realized in thinking about content this week is that it means nothing until the students fill the class. I use to think I was a terrible teacher because after a few weeks, the syllabus, my ideas, and my connections to that "thing" I created before class was just thrown out like a piece of roadside trash. I would adapt the learning level of the class, I would spend more time on skills and conversation that I thought important. And those weeks of careful building would start to crumble. By midterm, I was often in a state of chaos because I was the one at odds with my own content. Conversations, ideas, experiences - all coming from the students replaced my vision of the class. For a long time, I blamed myself for being caught between what I thought would and should happen and what was really happening in the classroom. And for the first time, this year, I feel like I can articulate this feeling of conflict with the content and the students. The more they infused ideas and good conversation - the more I grew frustrated that I couldn't pursue it, that I had to go back to those ideas that were created in a vacuum.
What is and was missing was the fact that the students will be the content and the assessment, they will be the coffee, the cream, the everything - and I need to contain it (the cup). This has brought about a sense of relief and a sense of shifting into a new paradigm.
Thursday, April 23, 2015
Rhizo15: From Connections to the Classroom / Part I

Three weeks left. And I told them, "I want you to spend this time doing something important to you and the research you've done in this class. The hard part, I am not going to tell you what to do. I am not going to even try to grade what you are going to do. I just want you to do something that is important to you and then tell me about it."
Immediately, one student said, "Because of my writing and thinking about the topic of my research, I really think I want to write a book. I want to take this time to actualize this book and start sketching out who this book will be about and what it is meant for." She went on to explain that she would create a daily journal where she continues to grow the ideas and the direction of the book. She would share some of that writing with me and what she has realized about herself in the process.
The second student listened and the said, "I wish all my teachers were like you. This is how I can learn, this is what I can do." I explained they wouldn't have to come to class anymore, but they would have to report back in a few weeks. They would be able to email me any time and I would help them, guide them, or mentor them along if they got stuck, wanted feedback, whatever. She leaned back and said, "This is so exciting, and a little scary. But it is what I can do." She waved her hand and said, "I'm getting emotional." And I knew where she was coming from. She said she was going to create a survey based on her research paper and try to refine data. She wanted to research and push what she knew about her topic. She wanted to do something rare, she wanted to find the information that was missing when she was looking for sources for her paper. She is picking up the path of others, standing on the shoulders of giants.
We set some ground rules. Your grade now is your final grade (they are excellent), or I can add on more for the work you do in the next few weeks, but I am not sure I can or want to assess that in terms of grades. I told them they didn't have attend class, but they had to communicate with me. In a few weeks, we will have a meeting to check in and see where their learning went and why.
And for a final examination - we will have a final examination lunch and discuss how this felt, what they expected, what they thought, what they learned, and how they feel about this type of learning.
Not only could I see the excitement of ideas and connections - but I could also feel that they were prideful, owners in their learning, excited that they were in control, and happy to be considered someone who should learn in this way.
Thinking back, I wish I started them earlier, I wish I trusted myself to trust them sooner. They have begun. I know they are excited and they will take this time to do something amazing. It feels strange that I am teaching less, and empowering them to do more. These feelings are the conflict between the traditional, objective methods of teaching in higher ed, and a model that has allowed two students to feel the excitement and the freedom of their own choices and ability in academia. I am excited for them. Today felt like a step in the right direction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)